We've also started to receive data from a few other sources which also saw some of the events and we thought it might be neat to have a science discussion on the blog. If you have other data to add, please feel free to contact me with it! If you have something quick to say, write a comment below. If it's longer, again, feel free to contact us!
As with all preliminary data we ask that you do not use anything here for publication or presentation without contacting the authors/PIs of the work and use the same rules of the road outlined by the Van Allen Team.
If you want to collaborate or use our data, please contact the BARREL Team through Robyn Millan <Robyn (dot) Millan (at) dartmouth (dot) edu>. Currently Robyn is at the ice and does receive e-mail, but the internet is slow so it may take awhile to get a response.
- As part of the development of collaboration with the broader Heliophysics community, the mission has drafted a "Rules of the Road" to govern how Van Allen Probes instrument data is used.
- Van Allen Probes Mission Rules of the Road for Data Usage
- The PI shall make all scientific data products available to the public, as stated in the Van Allen Probes Science Data Management Plan.
- Data products requiring significant data analysis will be made available at a best level effort.
- Users should consult with the PI to discuss the appropriate use of instrument data or model results and to ensure that the Users are accessing the most recent available versions of the data and analysis routines. VOs should facilitate this, serving as the contact point between PI and users in most cases.
- Users should heed the caveats of investigators to the interpretation and limitations of data or model results. Investigators supplying data or models may insist that such caveats be published. Data and model version numbers should also be specified.
- Browse products are not intended for science analysis or publication and should not be used for those purposes without consent of the PI.
- Users should acknowledge the sources of data used in all publications, presentations and reports.
- "We acknowledge the NASA Van Allen Probes and [PI name] for use of data."(list of PIs)
- Users are requested to provide the PI a copy of each manuscript that uses the PI's data upon submission of that manuscript for consideration of publication. On publication, the citation should be transmitted to the PI and any other providers of data.
With that all taken care of, here is the day with our first events.
We saw a small spike ~0430 UT, a small longer duration event around ~0930 UT - 11:00 and another small longer duration event at ~2330 UT all on January 9th 2013.
If we look to see where we were for the three events we have
Carol Weaver from UNH who works with the Halley Bay magnetometer data contacted me almost immediately saying that they had observed something and could I please share it. (Sorry it's taken me a while to get this conversation started)
Here's the quick look data she sent me where we see a bursty wave ~0430UT and possibly some Pc3 or Pc4 waves during the first longer duration event.
and some nice spectrograms from GOES 13 which had a magnetic footprint close to I think 1D.
We have some great data from Joe Fennell from the MagEIS instrument showing a enhancement in the flux around the loss cone only in the lower energy bands, which are in the same band that we see the enhancements in! It's always nice when things agree. They can do so much more with their data than what shown here, but this is a quick look of what we might find once everything is processed. As Joe says, "It is clear that the 'loss cone region' is fairly empty at the higher energies" So I've tried to show where I think the loss cone may be in the plot (the black circles), but correct me if I'm wrong. I've also put lines around the time when we saw the first event at 1D and 1J.
If we look at some of the quick look data around the web:
First place to look... Was there any geophysical activity... Sort of. It looks like for the second event there was some auroral activity, possibly a substorm.
However there was nothing really in Dst. Xinlin Li provides a really nice prediction of the real time Dst, and as his plots scale, I've been looking at his lately to see if there is anything, anything at all.
Cluster quick look plots
There is a lot of data available on line and this is just a smattering, but it looks like there is some interesting stuff.
Any comments/ additions? I'll add more as we go. Just think how excited we'll be once we get a much larger actual event involving relativistic precipitation!